This is great news from the left and the right in support of US sovereignty. I am not a supporter of the United Nations. As far as I am concerned we can push the building into the Atlantic and build something for the people of America. No country in their right mind should allow UN to dictate what its citizens should do or how they should act. The UN was a nice idea that needs to be dismantled. We already meet regularly with nations we are friends with and sometimes with those that we are not. We do not need a governing body that will dictate what we can and cannot do. The UN has its own agenda. It is an agenda that does not keep in mind the sovereignty of its member nations in mind. Its only concern seems to be how it can rob a few nations to give to a few nations. I have a mind of my own and I can decided who should get my support. I don't need the UN, the Federal, State or Local Governments to tell me what to do with my hard earned dollars. This is the biggest challenge we are facing as a nation right now. Why is our debt ceiling about to be reached? Why did we bail out Banks and State Governments? Who benefited? What change has there been since October 2009? None! Unemployment is holding steady at 9.2%. We continue in a downward spiral of spending and spending with no end in sight. Stop! Use common sense! Follow the law! The answers are in our constitution and those whom oppose UN Gun Control are on the right tract. Look to the rest of the Constitution to lead to better decisions for the US before it is too late.
Democrats Oppose Obama-U.N. Gun Control Treaty - Washington Whispers (usnews.com)
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Friday, July 22, 2011
Why I Get Mad at the Super Market
I used to think I was wrong to get mad a people using "Food Stamps" or "Government Welfare" while I noticed them also waring gold rings, nicer clothes than I had on, and buying stakes in stead of canned meat like I was, now I know why. The Census Bureau in their last report on the poor listed them as having a better life style than I do. I always thought that the poor were homeless, starving, and unable to enjoy the same comforts I do. I have AC, Satellite TV, washer and dryer, and other modern comforts but so do 63.7% of the people who call themselves poor. Where is my share? I should be considered poor.
Click on the following link to get the full story. Modern Poverty Includes A.C. and an Xbox - By Ken McIntyre - The Corner - National Review Online
Harry
Click on the following link to get the full story. Modern Poverty Includes A.C. and an Xbox - By Ken McIntyre - The Corner - National Review Online
Harry
Thursday, July 21, 2011
More Negotiations
Debt limits, negotiation, blah, blah, blah,blah. Why are we still negotiation? Why are we making deals? Ever see the commercial where the firemen run the congress and ask "Do you want clean water?' Everyone says yes. That is the kind of leadership we need. Enough of the deal making, make a the hard decisions to correct the errors of the last hundred years.
f | Drudge Report Feed ★ 1,000
f | Drudge Report Feed ★ 1,000
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Houston Veterans Claim Censorship of Prayers, Including Ban on 'God' and 'Jesus'
I am back at it. Yes once again I am back blogging. I read an article in the Knights of Columbus magazine July Issue (not online yet) "Columbia" titled "Where Freedom is Threatened" by Leonard Leo. In this article he reports about countries and societies that are anti-religion or hostile to one or more religious minorities. Now today I read this "Huston Veterans Claim Censorship of Prayers, Including Ban on 'God' and 'Jesus'", what happened to the right to freedom of religion or for that matter freedom of speech? Are the words 'God' and 'Jesus' protected under free speech let alone the freedom of religion? How secular we have become when mentioning 'God' or 'Jesus' is not a normal part of a funeral?
It is my opinion that the main downfall of America is secularism and the underlining misunderstanding of our Constitutional Amendments especiall the First Amendment. The following is the exact quote of the First Amendment "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Does anyone see in there the phrase "Separation of Church and State?" Of course not because it is found no ware in the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution or the Amendments to the Constitution. Go ahead read them if you don't trust me.
The phrase "Separation of Church and State" is an off shoot of the phrase "wall of separation between church and state,", as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. What he was referring to is the Federal Government not to have the ability to setup a national church. There is nothing about Prayer in school's, reading the Bible or saying a prayer in a Government Building, or anything pointing to the removal of any or all religious icons, holiday's or the mentioning of God. People who believe we were founded by men and women who were not religious in nature do not know their history.
Our country was founded on the principals that our rights come from our Creator. That the individual can make a difference and most importantly the Federal Government should stay out of our lives. It makes me frustrates to see so many people rely on the Government for everything. Giving up rights for security, giving up religious freedoms to accommodate or placate people who have no belief. Not allowing discourse instead embracing political correctness. We must all change. We need to get back to relying on ourselves, family, friends and neighbors. Like the people of Tuscaloosa, hit by that terrible tornado, they helped each other and people from all over came to help. No one called for FEMA. We can do it like them and all make a difference.
Harry
It is my opinion that the main downfall of America is secularism and the underlining misunderstanding of our Constitutional Amendments especiall the First Amendment. The following is the exact quote of the First Amendment "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Does anyone see in there the phrase "Separation of Church and State?" Of course not because it is found no ware in the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution or the Amendments to the Constitution. Go ahead read them if you don't trust me.
The phrase "Separation of Church and State" is an off shoot of the phrase "wall of separation between church and state,", as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. What he was referring to is the Federal Government not to have the ability to setup a national church. There is nothing about Prayer in school's, reading the Bible or saying a prayer in a Government Building, or anything pointing to the removal of any or all religious icons, holiday's or the mentioning of God. People who believe we were founded by men and women who were not religious in nature do not know their history.
Our country was founded on the principals that our rights come from our Creator. That the individual can make a difference and most importantly the Federal Government should stay out of our lives. It makes me frustrates to see so many people rely on the Government for everything. Giving up rights for security, giving up religious freedoms to accommodate or placate people who have no belief. Not allowing discourse instead embracing political correctness. We must all change. We need to get back to relying on ourselves, family, friends and neighbors. Like the people of Tuscaloosa, hit by that terrible tornado, they helped each other and people from all over came to help. No one called for FEMA. We can do it like them and all make a difference.
Harry
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Reporters Calling Others Names
Ed Schultz calls Laura Ingraham a slut. See this Drudge Report. I can't understand why reporters on the left of center use name calling and other forms of deformation to make a point. Isn't there a course they can take to learn to use intelligent reporting rather than mud slinging. I used to think the news was about facts, however lately the level of slander has increased on the left. Not sure what to say? What do you think?
Harry
Harry
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Anchor Babies
Many illegal aliens have children in the United States so that they can reap the benefits that the Constitution allows. This is a problem for me because people have broken the law to attain a right. It is wrong for them to be here, so why should we grant American Citizenship to their child? The child innocent in this matter. The parents are the law breakers. I believe that this law will stop this problem.
It is not the United States that is the one's at fault, it is the countries outside our boarders that are the problems. They need to fix their system and not force their citizens to become criminal in our country. We also need to establish a simpler way for people who want to come to out country and become citizens. Our nation is a melting pot dependent on immigrants. My grandfathers parents on my dad's side of the family immigrated from Japan, and on my mothers side some of her ancestors arrived via the Mayflower. The rest of my lineage are Native Americans, Hawaiian and Cherokee, who were here before America existed. They had no choice in the matter of becoming a citizen or not.
I am often asked why I speak out against illegal aliens? My answer is we are a county of laws and if they don't respect our laws why should we respect them. When an American breaks a law they pay a fine or go to jail, however if you are an illegal alien and have a child in America, the parents have already broken a law and are not punished. What message are we sending to the child, or anyone else for that matter. Does the laws of the land apply to them or not? They do and we should enforce them.
[U.S. House and Senate] Support Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011
It is not the United States that is the one's at fault, it is the countries outside our boarders that are the problems. They need to fix their system and not force their citizens to become criminal in our country. We also need to establish a simpler way for people who want to come to out country and become citizens. Our nation is a melting pot dependent on immigrants. My grandfathers parents on my dad's side of the family immigrated from Japan, and on my mothers side some of her ancestors arrived via the Mayflower. The rest of my lineage are Native Americans, Hawaiian and Cherokee, who were here before America existed. They had no choice in the matter of becoming a citizen or not.
I am often asked why I speak out against illegal aliens? My answer is we are a county of laws and if they don't respect our laws why should we respect them. When an American breaks a law they pay a fine or go to jail, however if you are an illegal alien and have a child in America, the parents have already broken a law and are not punished. What message are we sending to the child, or anyone else for that matter. Does the laws of the land apply to them or not? They do and we should enforce them.
[U.S. House and Senate] Support Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
[U.S. House and Senate] Oppose Extending the Patriot Act
It has been long enough. The Patriot Act needs to end. Handing over some of our rights seemed like a good idea to keep us safe, however in the nearly 10 years since its inception, Osama Bin Ladin is still at large and we are still at war. The ABC agencies will have to get warrants again before spying on all Americans. Oppose Extending the Patriot Act by clicking the link below and sending a message to your Senator and Representative.
[U.S. House and Senate] Oppose Extending the Patriot Act
[U.S. House and Senate] Oppose Extending the Patriot Act
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)